There is no specialized topic like “Relationships between funcoids and reloids” on Amazon. Well, if your research field is really specialized, Amazon may be worse for you. Surely, no: No housewife or carpenter would buy my e-book titled Algebraic General Topology. Somebody may claim that my readership quality is bad. The e-book I published less than 30 days ago was purchased three times on Amazon last month (not last year!) So the conclusion: Self-publishing on Amazon one gets far more readers than even the world’s most prestigious scientific journals. (Yes, people cite more often than they read :-).)ģ.93 x 0.59 = 2.31 readers per article of this journal per year. There are journals with even higher cites ( Mathematical Programming, Series B is 4.20 per document), but let’s consider this JAMS as the world’s most prestigious math journal (as it’s much above, for example, more famous than Mathematische Annalen in this list).ĭoes it make sense to publish in this journal? Yes, even in this world’s highest impact math journal, not speaking about weaker journals?Ĭonsider further statistics: Accordingly, this graph published at, readers, has just 0.59 of citations. It has 3.93 cites per document (is it cites for two years or one year measured during two years? Unsure).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |